Like coda for windows software#
Like coda for windows windows#

So at the end of the day, CodaвЂ™s claim to be a one-window app is valid. A click on that and your current window gets split vertically or horizontally. And to the far right is the вЂњsplit windowвЂќ symbol. There is a вЂњplusвЂќ symbol just under the toolbar, to the right of the file browser that you can click on to create new tabs. Moreover, Coda has more than just hot-key commands for new tabs. A simple click and drag does the trick just perfectly. The most important user-interface aspect of tabbed-windows is the ability to re-order the tabs.

Coda does utilize it, and utilizes it well. This seems like a moot issue, but there are still many apps that donвЂ™t utilize it. CodaвЂ™s tabs work identical to virtually all other tabbed interface apps in that you can hot-key between them with the standard CMD+SHIFT+ keys.ДЇinally, and most important, is user-interface. If youвЂ™re working in tabs you must be able to get from one to the other quickly and easily. (Though if you have 20 tabs open, you probably have bigger things to worry about than tab placement.) They are intelligently placed, and donвЂ™t go weird places when you have 20 of them open. CodaвЂ™s tabs are clean, subtle and easily identifiable. One of the reasons I have never used NetNewsWireвЂ™s built in browser is the slighly odd look and feel of the tabs.

There seem to be three major ingredients which make up a good tabbed-window interface. Especially when itвЂ™s the tabs which are part of the foundation of your вЂњone-windowвЂќ application. You have to have tabs that are above the norm of other applications and which meet the userвЂ™s expectations. Therefore, just having tabs is not enough. Nowadays tabs come standard with good apps.

Like coda for windows windows#

But even on my 23вЂі display at home, I prefer to have CodaвЂ™s window sized to about 85% of my screen and make use of the Text Editor and the Preview panes rather than have two apps running side-by-side at 45% screen-realestate each.ДЄnother reason Coda has helped break my habit of multiple-app web designing is the way it saves your previous work session, but more on that later.Д¬odaвЂ™s use of tabbed windows plays a critical part in its claim to fame as a one-window tool. Using CodaвЂ™s one-window interface has been especially wonderful when I am away from my home office and thus coding on my 12вЂі PowerBookвЂ™s 1024Г—768 screen resolution. And I know that for those who are more web-design and development savvy people than I, only three apps open would be like a vacation.ДЇor the past several weeks as IвЂ™ve been writing this article I have used nothing but Coda for web designing, and it has broken my age-old habits of CMD+TABbing between multiple apps. And, fortunately for Coda, this is where Panic excels in, and Coda does a superb job as a вЂњone-window applicationвЂќ.Д«efore Coda I always had at least three windows open at any given time when doing web-design: Transmit, TextWrangler and Safari. This is where usability and interface make or break the application. If you are going to write an application that has and does вЂњeverythingвЂќ there are a few key dynamics you have to keep in mind.ДЇirst of all you need to make it easy, simple and clear for the user to do all their work in your вЂњone windowвЂќ. Awesome stuff.Coda is a text-editing, CSS-styling, WebKit previewing, file-managing, FTPing, terminal-accessing, web-site-building and publishing application for the Macintosh.ДЄnd, Coda has no duct tape. This is the diamond in the rough! It provides everything that EditPlus had and a bunch more, integrating PanicвЂs Transmit FTP application a Terminal window a sexy Editor with all the features I love a browser window (Safari) a CSS Editor (which IвЂ™ll never use, although itвЂ™s cool) and a development Book library.

While it is a fairly decent editor, its FTP support and multi-window interface just left me wanting something more. For the past year IвЂ™ve been suffering with BBEdit.

Like coda for windows software#

My attempts at finding Mac development software that suited all those needs have turned up pretty lame results. The features that I found myself using within that editor that I am unable to live without are: I began development in a Windows environment a number of years ago and grew very happy (and spoiled) with EditPlus. IвЂ™ve had a Mac for quite a while now (wellвЂ¦I have two and hopefully a third very soon) and sadly development tools on the Mac have been pretty lame.